PDF | A simple summary of the philosophical consideration of the concept of difference by various thinkers ranging from Hegel to Derrida. Everything you need to understand both Laruelle’s critique of difference and his project of non-philosophy Gilles Deleuze described Laruelle’s thought as ‘one of . Everything you need to understand both Laruelle’s critique of difference and his project of non-philosophyGBS_insertPreviewButtonPopup ([‘ISBN
|Published (Last):||8 March 2007|
|PDF File Size:||18.26 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.22 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. In this lecture Brentano notes that in some respects philosophy is like the difrerence, showing a largely constant development, but in other respects is more like the fine arts, with their alternating periods of ripeness and decay.
This book deals with the holiest cows of contemporary continental thought Nietzsche, Derrida, Heidegger and Deleuze in an incredible way.
David rated it liked it Feb 07, These historical remarks pave the way for some rather sweeping systematic claims by Laruelle.
Second, he gives no proof for the assertion that his is a different sense of the One from that of the neo-Platonic philosophers. But while Laruelle already has a sizable following of Anglophone readers who discovered him in the original French, it took until for this first book-length work to appear in English. What Can Non-Philosophy Do? Christopher Gontar rated it really liked it Jul 11, Unfortunately, is tought system is basically Hei Laruelle’s “my philosophy is not philosophy” act is unconvincing but I don’t mind philsoophies along since Ethics of the Stranger was a great take on ethics and one o my all time favorite books.
Anne marked it as to-read Jan 12, Alan Bass – – Stanford University Press. Sign in Create an account.
Philosophies of Difference: A Critical Introduction to Non-Philosophy
Nicholson – – Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 4: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews philosophiees It is in this spirit that we must assess Laruelle’s Philosophies of Differencesince the unstated context of the book is that we are being asked to consider Laruelle as one of the formidable new French thinkers — a candidate for lasting importance to philosophy. Sign in to use this feature. Laruelle reads both Nietzsche and Deleuze as anti-realists of this sort.
Laruelle’s earlier “systematic dissolution of the resemblances of Hegel and Heidegger” fades back into an indifferent resemblance. Laaruelle Books no proxy Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. differejce
Everything you need to understand both Laruelle’s critique of difference and his project of non-philosophyGilles Deleuze described Laruelle’s laruekle as ‘one of the most interesting undertakings of contemporary philosophy’.
Laruelle tells us repeatedly that this is a “Judaic” strategy, though one that ultimately works in favor of the purely Greek concept of difference. Want to Read Currently Reading Read.
For it is not at all clear that his central insight is of value. He proposes a “science” in later books termed “non-philosophy” that will deliver us from philosophy, which always functions as an “absolute forgetting. Niklas rated it really liked it Mar 31, And here we reach the third and most serious obstacle to the reception of Laruelle’s work.
Laruelle then uses this analysis to introduce a new theoretical practice of non-philosophical thought.
Graham Harman, François Laruelle, Philosophies of Difference – PhilPapers
Now, Rocco Gangle – who translated Laruelle’s philosophy into English – takes you through Laruelle’s laeuelle book Philosophies of Difference, helping you to understand both Laruelle’s critique of Difference and his project of non-philosophy, which has become one of the most intriguing avenues in contemporary thought. All philosophy is based on decision, which philosopihes a “hallucinatory” character. Micah marked it as to-read Apr 01, Be the first to ask a question about Philosophies of Difference.
The one is that which will always be, necessarily, indifferent to any act of autopositional determination or ‘philosophical activism’. Sep 25, Rui Coelho rated it liked it. What good would it do to install an opposition between the One as a philosopnies “determination in the last instance” and the cosmos of difference where the “larvae” become entangled in their pointless games?
The Strangeness of Care. He currently directs an international organisation dedicated to furthering the cause of non-philosophy, the Organisation Non-Philosophique Internationale. Smith and David B.
In its relation to the one, a relation always suppressed, differential philosophy illuminates necessarily the possiblity of the non-philosophical solution phikosophies insofar as the one refuses any mode of autopositioning which is the basis of philosophical practice of an always immediate, irreducible real, discoverable behind any philosophical, decisional representation of it.
Science Logic and Mathematics.
François Laruelle’s Philosophies of Difference – Paperback – Rocco Gangle – Oxford University Press
Laruelle’s One is not the night, but the daylight in which all cows are black. Jesse Rupp rated it liked it Aug 02, Request removal from index.
Dusty rated it really liked it Feb 14, In Chapter 6, “Critique of Difference,” Laruelle shifts toward a positive development of his own theories, and does not wait long to communicate his audacity.