Authors. Hilary Kornblith Naturalizing Meaning Through Epistemology: Some Critical Notes. Naturalizing Epistemology, 2nd Ed. Edited by Hilary Kornblith. Naturalizing Epistemology: Quine, Simon and the Prospects for Pragmatism. Naturalizing Epistemology, 2nd Ed. Edited by Hilary Kornblith. In defense of a naturalized epistemology. Hilary Kornblith. In John Greco & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Blackwell. pp.
|Published (Last):||13 June 2013|
|PDF File Size:||16.96 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.72 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
VI; compare Feldman This entry has no external links. Obviously, there is to be no fast and easy resolution of this debate—not least because the nature of status of the a priorias well as what is required for knowledge, for example, are themselves hotly contested.
This final section briefly describes three further such areas —social epistemology, feminist epistemology, and the debate over epistemic rationality.
Routledge and Kegan Paul. But different theories and theorists within NE reject—to varying extents, in different ways, and for different reasons—different combinations of these features, and so differ in how much distance is put between their specific view and traditional epistemologies.
Naturalism in Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Others still raise issues facing all versions of NE—they remain front and center in current discussions of NE and its prospects. Edinburgh University Press, Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative.
However, because of its undeniable historical importance, and because it will serve to introduce some of the principal objections to Nayuralizing, it can hardly be ignored. Some theorists evaluate various social processes and institutions in terms of some more general, non-social feature e. The stimulation of his sensory receptors is all the evidence anybody has had to go on, ultimately, in arriving at his picture of the world. Traditionalists often regard these facts as necessary truths, and it is their necessity that enables evidentialists to endorse the supervenience thesis.
Similar themes, both methodological and epistemic, are at the forefront in Thomas Reid, who begins his first major work as follows:.
From Quine to a Feminist EmpiricismNaturaliaing The Geometry of Visibles and the Case for Realism2 nd ed. For general discussion and references, see Lammenranta n. A fair snapshot of the then-state of the art would be Knowing: However, the theories falling within TE are, once again, a varied lot; and those sympathetic to TE at times pull these features apart, emphasizing commitment to them to varying degrees and in various ways.
What Is Naturalized Naturalizlng In short, a prior method is needed to pick out which set of extra-mental events in the world naturwlizing be the target of a Kornblithian empirical investigation.
Hilary Kornblith, Naturalizing Epistemology – PhilPapers
In the sense that they seem to be material objects which they in fact are not. And yet, one might see that response as inviting once again the charge of self-defeat. A here states that justification is a function of the psychological processes that produce or preserve belief. As to the first, recall Section 1. It is the technology of truth-seeking, or, in a more cautiously epistemological term, prediction. But it is only relatively recently that it has gone by just that name and received so much focused attention.
Which of these many candidate extra-mental phenomena should philosophers of knowledge seek to investigate empirically?
But how are we supposed to go about trying to answer it? Cruz,Contemporary Theories of Knowledge2 nd ed. More generally, we need some respectable version of traditional episstemology methods reflecting on cases, consulting our intuitions, and so onor of alternative methods closely approximating them.
In defense of a naturalized epistemology
Naturalists join in rejecting one or more of the above features of traditional non-naturalistic epistemology. Much of the resulting debate recapitulates, in broad terms, the debate within TE as to the nature of justified, or rational, belief. Rottschaefer – – Zygon 26 1: For example, one might wonder why it is truthrpistemology prediction —rather than pleasure, say, or monetary gain—that is the epistemic end.
Empirical results and considerations of psychological feasibility play a large role within the rationality debate, and many of the facts and factors appealed to by friends of NE in their critique of TE see Sections 1. Also worth noting here are a pair of more strictly meta-epistemological desiderata Goldman announces at the start of the same paper.
Reprinted in John Haldane and Stephen Read eds. Naturalizing Meaning Through Epistemology: A Way to Social Epistemology. If all we hope for is a reconstruction that links science to experience in explicit ways short of translation, then it would seem more sensible to settle for psychology. Further, there is no guarantee anyway that a given method will vindicate itself—a method may generate evidence that undermines its own reliability ibid.
Naturalism in Epistemology
Nonetheless, as recent commentators have pointed out see, e. Cambridge University Press, pp. Finally and, in some cases, along the waywe will briefly consider the relation between NE and some other recent and important subjects, positions, and developments—some of them just as controversial as NE itself.
Just nsturalizing importantly, others working within an experimental framework have raised questions about those data themselves. Only then, he thought, would we be in a position to get our epistemic position into proper perspective. According eistemology others, such results, together with a psychologically realistic view of how human reasoning actually proceeds, point up the need to revise standard views of what rationality involves.