Mezhepler Tarihi: Muhammed Ebu Zehra. 1 like. Book. Mezhepler Tarihi. Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Mezhepler Tarihi – Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Category: Religious. Description. MUHAMMED EBU ZEHRA, ÝSLÂMDA SIYASÎ VE ÝTIKADÎ MEZHEPLER TARIHI (A HISTORY OF POLITICAL AND THEOLOGICAL SCHOOLS IN ISLAM)
|Published (Last):||13 December 2010|
|PDF File Size:||15.6 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.85 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
So, even if they are wrong, he insists on his views. Each one grabs an organ of the elephant and tries to imagine what it is.
Some blind reach the place of an elephant. The difference in the capacity of understanding and insight: Skip to main content.
Galiyye – Vikipedi
And these groups have principles and measures of their own. If looked into as a whole, not separately, the truth will be better understood.
Therefore; tariih there are verses supporting the Mutazile who says that people create their own deeds and that God has no intervention in the deeds of His slaves; there are also verses supporting the Cebriyye who says that people have no will and that they are like leaves in the wind against the will of God. In addition, there are the ones who are stupid, whose hearts are blind and confused. In the things man wills he cannot escape responsibility.
İ SLÂ MDA FIKHİ MEZHEPLER TARİ Hİ M. EBU ZEHRA.
The one who reaches to its back says that this is a creature like high hills. What are the reasons of the difference in views about Islamic issues? As their understanding and capacities differ, their views and beliefs differ likewise.
One of the reasons of the disagreement is the imitation of the old; because imitation causes blind and faulty conviction. This kind of a desire leads someone to the conviction that what he says is the ultimate truth and the opposite views are absolutely wrong. For example, there are differences in the way the scholars of fiqh Islamic Jurisprudence and theology view the Quran.
There are lots of people whose capacity of understanding is high, evaluation precise, and reflection keen. Wherever is human there is disagreement, because this is part of the characteristics of human. Wherever there is blind conviction, it is just natural that excessive disagreements exist, because the mentality of imitation kills the objective reasoning and causes the minds to become dim.
Disagreements arise because everyone has different desires, interests, and dispositions. So, each group of job will proceed in accordance with their principles.
Even twins of a family raised in the same culture, under the same material and spiritual circumstances, and instructed by the same teachers may disagree in some issues.
There are very different groups of tariih. About this issue, Spinoza says, What shows us the matter beautiful is our desires and tendencies. For this reason, the matter will be better understood if all the verses about the issue are looked into.
In order to make a comment, please login or register. Most often, the disagreements arise not because the issues are unclear or hard to comprehend, but because ebuu side of the disagreement does not know the view of the other. As is seen, each of them understood just one part of the truth, declared their friends wrong, and claimed that they are mistaken in the understanding of the truth. If I may put it this way, as it is better to look at the elephant and depict it as a whole; it is also better to zehrs at the verses of the Koran as a whole.
For example, while it is mentioned in the Koran about the free will of the human, it mzehepler also stated that all kinds of will and power are peculiar to God. Thus the issue which is seen as two sided is understood and it is seen that they do not contradict one another. Besides the factor of creation, the other factors having effect in this matter are shortly as follow: Otherwise, it may be thought that everyone says the truth at the first glance; but in reality the conclusion they reach is defective and lacking.
Log in Create new account Random Question. The one who grabs one of its legs says that this is a long and round animal similar to a trunk of a tree. The example of Plato clarifies this issue very well: This is one of the reasons why the learned differed in their views and sects.
For this reason, Socrates says, If the thing upon which disagreement exits is known, every disagreement stops. And in the end, their conclusions will be different in the same issues.
What are the reasons of the difference in views about Islamic issues?
Every person penetrates into an aspect of the truth. So, Man wills and God creates. The fact that the issues that are open to disagreement are actually unclear: I want to ask a question.